It’s not that the companies are unaware of the harm their platforms are causing. ‘Uncharted territory’: How Asia is coping with extreme heat But once the limit is reached, minors can simply enter a passcode to keep watching. For instance, TikTok recently introduced a default 60-minute time limit for users under 18. Other measures social platforms have taken to address concerns about children’s mental health are also easily circumvented. To comply with federal regulation, social media companies already ban kids under 13 from signing up to their platforms – but children have been shown to easily get around the bans, both with and without their parents’ consent. How does that happen if you’re actually enforcing your policies?” Yet 40% of kids 8 through 12 are on social media. “You can just look at the age requirements, where platforms have said 13 is the age at which people can start using their platforms. Murthy told The Associated Press in an interview. “I recognize technology companies have taken steps to try to make their platforms healthier and safer, but it’s simply not enough,” Mr. Vivek Murthy is asking tech companies to share data and increase transparency with researchers and the public and prioritize users’ health and safety when designing their products. With young people’s social media use “near universal” but its true impact on mental health not fully understood, Dr. The United States surgeon general is warning there is not enough evidence to show that social media is safe for children and teens – and is calling on tech companies, parents, and caregivers to take “immediate action to protect kids now.” And that takes a lot of work. Today’s lead story, as arduous as it was, is an attempt to do that – to understand an important part of America just a little bit better, to help open the door to progress for all.

Finding answers will be impossible without understanding those deeper forces. The roots of violence everywhere are as much mental as political, influenced by culture and values.

But that same rule applies to all regions – in the U.S. To ensure he got the story right, Patrik went back a second time. What we found was a portrait not of policies or legislative bills, but of an underlying mental landscape and how that has led to higher rates of violence. Why?In traveling to Nashville, Tennessee, and Alexander City, Alabama, Noah Robertson and Patrik Jonsson sought to show different faces of violence in the South, in large cities and rural hamlets, without falling into stereotypes or shallow narratives. And within these trends, one sticks out for its clarity and constancy: The American South has dramatically higher levels of violence. There is no single “gun violence problem” in the United States, but different challenges in different places. Rather, it is a product of the subject: the roots of violence. American conversations about gun violence – particularly mass shootings – often revolve around gun laws and mental health.But the closer we looked, the more we saw something else. Today’s lead article was not one of those stories. That’s not criticism. An idea emerges, and with a minimum of fuss, it is done. Sometimes, a story comes together with kinetic beauty.

Maryland judiciary procurement